Did Trump & Epstein Rape Young Girls Together? “I Was Donald’s Closest Friend For 10 Years”
HOME -
My Rumble Channel -- Waking the World up
Please Visit my other Blog Sites - Answers to Mysterious and Chronic Health Conditions and Fairness and Correctness
Did Trump & Epstein Rape Young Girls Together? “I Was Donald’s Closest Friend For 10 Years”
These Court Documents Indicate – a very strong possibility. But, read them for yourself and make your own deductions.
Epstein told his brother Mark prior to his death: “If I said what I know about both candidates, they’d have to cancel the election.”
Was Epstein murdered because of this pending Court case?
Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16
*NOTE: This was a REAL Case (excerpts included below with sources to all documents). Look the case # up for yourself. It was Dismissed and Fact Checkers are saying this is not Evidence of Anything.
Yes, these were Allegations, but these are about as serious as allegations as one can have on their record.
Ask Yourself, if the media really hated Trump, why wouldn’t they probe this and bring it to the Public’s attention and make Trump answer this.
The answer is simple – the script says it’s once again time for DJT to take the stage to drive the narrative.
It makes you wonder if Epstein was actually axed because of his inside knowledge of what DJT did to little girls.
He was known to keep hidden cameras and had video on just about everyone.
Did he have video of Trump?
Why was Trump’s name in Epstein’s Black Book? *See source # 5 below.
Trump and Epstein did hang out and they did party together.
Mark Epstein claimed that before his brother died in jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, he told him he knew secrets that could blow up the presidential election between Trump and Hillary Clinton.
“Here’s a direct quote: ‘If I said what I know about both candidates, they’d have to cancel the election.’ That’s what Jeffrey told me in 2016,” Mark Epstein told the New York Post.
Author Michael Wolff made several salacious claims about Epstein and Trump on the October 31 episode of his podcast Fire and Fury, which he co-hosts with former Condé Nast editor James Truman. On November 2, The Daily Beast published another tape of Epstein talking with Wolff in which he claimed, “I was Donald’s closest friend for 10 years.”
Yes, Epstein said he was Trump’s CLOSEST friend for 10 Years.
Yes, Epstein said he was Trump’s CLOSEST friend for 10 Years.
He told this to Michael Wolf who has the Fire and Fury podcast.
What Else Did Epstein say about Trump according to Michael Wolf?
1. The FBI found photos of Trump with young girls after they raided his home in 2019. Epstein was said to be “Afraid of Trump.”
2. Trump & Epstein had a bet in who would sleep with Princess Diana first.
3. Trump liked to “F*ck the Wives of His Best Friends.”
4. Trump’s White House team was made in a New York Restaurant in 2017.
5. Trump is “charming,” but “He’s a horrible human being. He does nasty things to his best friends, best friends’ wives, anyone who he first tries to gain their trust and uses it to do bad things to them.”
6. Trump first slept with Melanie on Epstein’s plane – “The Lolita Express.”
Trump and Epstein were also photographed together in 1992 and 1997. The now famous image below shows Trump and then-girlfriend Melania Knauss partying with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago on February 12, 2000.
This case was to be tried about EXACTLY when Trump was elected in 2016.
How convenient it was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice, meaning that charges could still be refiled, unsure about statute of limitations.
Was Epstein removed to pave a clear and worry-free path for Trump to play this role of being a clean cut guy who is going to clean the swamp and remove the Deep State (which is complete laughable, once you dig deep and find out he was born in the Swamp and is definitely 100% IN the Club.)
One thing is for sure, Trump has been accused by over 20 females of Sexual Misconduct and has paid Millions to settle cases.
It is so easy to look the other way when the country is in the state it is in.
Everyone is filled with so much hope?
How did that hope go the first time around? A Pandemic was created, the country was shut down, vaccines were mandated and in the midst of the lockdown, Trump initiated 5G to be put up EVERYWHERE.
Then they play the card that Biden stole the election to make Trump look like he was screwed, and now the “savior” is back.
Is it a major jump to think this way?
This is just the use of free speech while connecting all the dots from the past.
This is not being stated as Fact but some things that need to be considered.
Censorship is about NOT Asking Questions.
In this day and age we should be constantly asking questions.
Anyway, here is just a part of of the Case – go visit that site as it gets much deeper into the details regarding the accusations of horrendous acts by DJT -- from Sources #4 & #5 below.
A lawsuit is filed
accusing Trump and Epstein of rape, sexual misconduct and threats
against a minor in 1994.
What is the nature of the
lawsuit?
What accusations are made against Trump?
Ask
your own questions
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, proceeding under a
pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendants.) Case No.:JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL
MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING,
ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL
DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Plaintiff Jane
Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym, brings this action against Donald
J.Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, and alleges that:
PARTIES
2. Plaintiff is an individual residing in and a citizen of the
State of California.2.
3. Upon information and belief, Defendants Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epsteineach reside in this District and are citizens of the State of New York.
JURISDICTION AND
VENUE
4. Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of
California for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
1332.4.
5. Defendants are
citizens of the State of New York for purposes of diversity
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
6. This
Court has original subject matter jurisdiction with respect to this
action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as there exists complete
diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffand Defendants and the
amount in controversy exceeds Seventy Five Thousand
Dollars($75,000.00), exclusive of interest and costs.
7. Defendants are each subject to the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1332 with proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 as both defendants are residents ofand/or are domiciled in this district and the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this district.
RAPE, SEXUAL
MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING,
ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL
DISTRESS, DURESS, AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT.
8. Plaintiff was
subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and
reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false
imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by
the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer
months of 1994. The partieswere held by Defendant Epstein at a New
York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E.
71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of
age 13 andwas legally incapable under New York law of consenting to
sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY
Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third
degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first,
second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and
third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information and belief,
predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York
law, e.g., NYPenal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on
information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter
alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or
reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force
and serious bodily harm, under New York law. Declaration of Plaintiff
Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B
hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman
wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of
Defendant Epstein. Exh. B.8.
9. Courts have discretion to
allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the
public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to
the defendants.
Sealed Plaintiff v.
Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation
involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature,
and identification ofPlaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory
physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of theten factors
that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis
favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g.,factors one
and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly
sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether
identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to
the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or even more
critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with
respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also
appropriate as she is a rape victim.9.
10. Plaintiff was
enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend aseries
of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a
New York City residencethat was being used by Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended byDefendant
Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in
1994, Defendant Trump had
known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02), and
knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.10.
11. Defendant Trump initiated
sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the
fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant
Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then
proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this
savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump
to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s
pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand
and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A
andB.11.
12. Immediately following this rape, Defendant
Trump threatened Plaintiff that,
were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical
abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be
physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.12.
13.
Defendant Epstein had sexual contact with Plaintiff at two of the
parties. The second sexual encounter with Defendant Epstein took
place after Plaintiff had been raped by Defendant Trump. Defendant
Epstein forced himself upon Plaintiff and proceeded to rape her
anally and vaginally despite her loud pleas to stop. Defendant
Epstein then attempted to strike Plaintiff about the head with his
closed fists while he angrily screamed at Plaintiff that he,
Defendant Epstein, rather than Defendant Trump, should have been the
one who took Plaintiff’s virginity, before Plaintiff finally
managed to break away from Defendant Epstein. Exhs. A andB.
13.
14. The threats of violence against Plaintiff and her
family continued, this time from Defendant Epstein, who again
reiterated that Plaintiff was not to reveal any of the details of his
sexual and physical abuse of her or else, specifically, Plaintiff and
her family would be seriously physically harmed, if not killed. Exhs.
A and B.14.
15. While still under threats of physical
harm by coming forward and having no reason to believe that the
threats have ever been lifted or would ever be lifted, Plaintiff, who
has suffered from stress, emotional distress, mental pain and
suffering, among other problems, ever since the assaults, was
subjected to daily painful reminders of the horrific acts of one of
the perpetrators, Defendant Trump,
via mass media coverage of him starting on or about June 16, 2015
that, over a short period of time, became continuous and unavoidable.
Exh. A.15.
16. As a direct and proximate result of the
sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her,
Plaintiff has suffered stress, emotional distress, and mental pain
and suffering, as well as adverse physical consequences.
17.
As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults and rapes
perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has suffered physical
pain and suffering.
18. As a direct and proximate result
of the sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her,
Plaintiff has been subjected to public scorn, hatred, and ridicule
and has suffered threats against her life and physical safety.
19. As a direct and proximate result of the sexual assaults
and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon her, Plaintiff has incurred
special damages, including medical and legal expenses.19.
The
sexual assaults and rapes perpetrated by Defendants upon Plaintiff
were intentional acts.
20. The conduct of Defendants
demonstrates willful, reckless and intentional conduct that raises a
conscious indifference to consequences.
21. At the
appropriate time in this litigation, Plaintiff shall amend her
complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages against Defendants
in order to punish Defendants for their actions and to deter
Defendants from repeating their conduct.
TOLLING OF STATUTE
OF LIMITATIONS
22. Any statute of
limitations applicable to rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual
acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional
and reckless infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment of
a minor, if any, is tolled owing to the continuous and active duress
imposed upon Plaintiff by Defendants that effectively robbed
Plaintiff of her freewill to commence legal action until the present
time.
Cullen v. Margiotta
, 811 F.2d 698, 722(2nd Cir.1987); Ross v. United States, 574 F.
Supp. 536, 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). More particularly, Plaintiff was
unrelentingly threatened by each Defendant that, were she ever to
reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to
her by Defendants, Plaintiff and her family would be physically
harmed if not killed. The duress has not terminated and thefear has
not subsided. The duress is an element of or inherent in the
underlying causes of action complained of herein. The duress and
coercion exerted by Defendants has been such as to haveactually
deprived Plaintiff of her freedom of will to institute suit earlier
in time, and it rose tosuch a level that a person of reasonable
firmness in Plaintiff's situation would have been unable to resist.
Exhs. A and B.23.
Both Defendants let
Plaintiff know that each was a very wealthy, powerful man and
indicated that they had the power, ability and means to carry out
their threats. Indeed, Defendant Trump stated that Plaintiff
shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like
Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the
third incident with Defendant Trump and that Plaintiff had not seen
since that third incident, and that he was capable of having her
whole family killed. Exhs. A and B.24.
The duress had
prevented Plaintiff from starting litigation before this
year.However, as soon as she surfaced, she received threats. More
specifically, shortly after her first complaint was filed in
California on April 26, 2016, she started receiving threatening phone
calls on her cell phone. Exh. A.25.
Defendants are
equitably stopped from arguing that any statute of limitations has
not been tolled as Defendants wrongfully forced Plaintiff to refrain
from timely commencing this action by threats, duress, and other
misconduct. Exhs. A and B.26.
Moreover, this action has
been brought before the facts giving rise to the estoppelhave ceased
to be operational (i.e., while still under threats of physical harm
by coming forward and having no reason to believe that the threats
have ever been lifted or would ever be lifted) and since Plaintiff
has decided to seek redress at this time, Plaintiff seeks an order of
protection in favor of Plaintiff and all associated with her so as to
protect them from harm and harassment from Defendants and their
agents and associates. Exh. A.
DEFAMATION
27. On
information and belief, on or about April 28, 2016, Defendant Trump
provided the following statement to American Media, Inc. and/or Radar
Online LLC for publication on at least their website RadarOnline.com
regarding Plaintiff’s complaint ED CV 16-797-DMG (KSx) filed in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California:
“The allegations
are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level
and clearly
framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are
simply politically motivated. There is
absolutely no merit to
these allegations. Period.”
28. The statement
provided for publication by Defendant Trump was published by said
website and has been republished elsewhere in whole orin part
numerous times (and similar statements of an attorney for Defendant
Trump were also published). The statement provided for publication by
Defendant Trump and that was published by said websites is false as
it pertains to Plaintiff.
The published statement is
libelous on its face, and clearly exposes Plaintiff to hatred,
contempt, ridicule and obloquy.
29. As a proximate
result of the above-described publication, Plaintiff has suffered
loss of her reputation, shame, mortification, and injury to her
feelings, all to her damage in an amount to be established by proof
at trial.
30. The above-described publication was not privileged because it was published by Defendant Trump with malice, hatred and ill will toward Plaintiff and the desire to injure her.
31. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Trump’s defamation of Plaintiff Plaintiff has been subjected to public scorn, hatred, and ridicule and has suffered other injury.
PRAYER FOR
RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and
for the following relief:
A. That judgment be
entered against Defendants for special damages, compensatory damages,
and punitive damages in an amount which shall be shown to be
reasonable and just bythe evidence and in excess of Seventy Five
Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), exclusive of interests and costs;
9B. That all costs of this action be assessed against
Defendants, including all
reasonable attorney’s fees, costs
and expenses of this action ;C. That an order of protection in favor
of Plaintiff and all associated with her be issued so as to protect
them from harm and harassment from Defendants and their agents
andassociates; andD. Such other and further relief as the Court may
deem just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all issues properly triable by jury in this action. Respectfully
Respectfully
submitted, Dated: June 20, 2016 By: / s/ Thomas Francis Meagher
Thomas Francis
Meagher SDNY Bar Code TM6707One Palmer Square Princeton, New Jersey
08542Telephone: (609) 558-1500tmeagher@thomasfmeagheresq.comATTORNEY
FOR PLAINTIFF.
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, Jane Doe, the
Plaintiff in this matter proceeding under a pseudonym, state as
follows:
1. I am a competent
adult over 18 years of age able to testify as to personal knowledge.
The facts in this
declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information, and belief, and I am competent to testify to them if
called upon to do so.
2. I was subject to
extreme sexual and physical abuse by the Defendants, including
forcible rape, that took place at several parties of Defendant
Epstein during the summer of 1994 in New York City at a residence
used by Defendant Epstein. During this period, I was 13 years old.
3. More
particularly, I traveled by bus to New York City in June 1994 in the
hope of starting a modeling career. I went to several modeling
agencies but was told that I needed to put together a modeling
portfolio before I would be considered. I then went to the Port
Authority in New York City to start to make my way back home. There I
met a woman who introduced herself to me as Tiffany.
She told me about
the parties and said that, if I would join her at the parties, I
would be introduced to people who could get me into the modeling
profession. Tiffany also told me I would be paid for attending.
4. The parties were
held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein.
Each of the parties
had other minor females and a number of guests of Mr. Epstein,
including Defendant Donald Trump at four of the parties I attended. I
understood that both Mr. Trump and Mr.Epstein knew that I was 13
years old.
5. Defendant Trump
had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of
1994.
On the fourth and
final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me
to a bed, exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape
me. During the course of this savage sexual attack, I loudly pleaded
with
Defendant Trump to
stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded tomy pleas by
violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming
that he would do whatever he wanted.
6. Immediately
following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened me that, were I
ever
to reveal any of the details of Defendant Trump’s sexual
and physical abuse of me, my family and I would be physically harmed
if not killed.
7. Defendant Epstein
had sexual contact with me at two of the parties that summer.
On the second occasion involving Defendant Epstein, Defendant Epstein forced himself upon me and proceeded to rape me anally and vaginally despite my loud please to stop. Defendant Epstein then attempted tostrike me about the head with his closed fists while he angrily screamed at me that he, Defendant Epstein, should have been the one who took my virginity, not Defendant Trump, before I finally managed to break away from Defendant Epstein.
**NOTE: This is just part of all the documents – One Final Excerpt Highlight:
7. It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.
8. I personally witnessed four sexual encounters that the Plaintiff was forced to have with Mr.Trump during this period, including the fourth of these encounters where Mr. Trump forcibly raped her despite her pleas to stop.
SO: Is it possible that Trump is a Sexual Deviant, a Raping Pedophile?
He did say that if Ivanka wasn’t his own daughter he would date her.
Isn’t that just a little hint?
Sources:
1. TheFreedomArticles -- https://rumble.com/v5n3fw2-trump-and-epstein-raped-girls-together-remember-video-155.html
2. Doe v Trump – Download Free Pdf’s on this Case -- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4357335/9/doe-v-trump/
3. Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit -- https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits#fullscreen?platform=hootsuite
4. The 19 Page PDF File – Case 1:16-cv-07673 – Jane Doe v Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein – filed on 9/30/2016 -- https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3130729/DOE-V-TRUMP.pdf
5. Why is Donald Trump’s Name in Pedophile Epstein’s Little Black Book? -- https://thefreedomarticles.com/trump-and-pedophilia-epstein-black-book/
6. Many More Trump Wake Up Rumble Videos – The Man Isn’t Who We Think -- https://mrnavac.blogspot.com/2024/10/trump-truther-rumble-videos.html
*******************************************************
Earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase, every day. Plus a $200 Cash Bonus. → https://i.capitalone.com/GxODNQtCd
For a limited time only—earn a one-time $250 cash bonus if they spend $500 on purchases within 3 months from account opening.
Earn 1.5% cash back on every purchase, every day.
Earn 5% cash back on hotels and rental cars booked through Capital One Travel.
Enjoy a $0 annual fee.
***********************************************************
PROTECT YOURSELF: Protect yourself, your children and loved ones from the harmful EMF from the newly installed 5G Towers. We are constantly being Bombarded by Harmful Radiation, being hit from all directions, every single day.
Orgone Generators, Pendants, Phone Shields, & EMF Protection for Laptops
Orgone Pendants & Phone Shields & Energy Generators and much more- https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/528/
Special Offers -- https://www.ftwproject.com/our-special-offers/ref/528/
Follow me on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/WakeUpWorld
*Also: Please Visit My Blog Homepage, where I am now placing Full Summaries all my Top Videos and you will find many videos that I have not released to public yet → https://mrnavac.blogspot.com/2021/03/deaths-and-side-effects.html
Thank You!!
END. 11/9/2024 – 9:00 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Post a Comment