Trump Administration wants to REVOKE Religious Exemptions for Vaccinations
HOME -
My Rumble Channel -- Waking the World up
Link to Watch ALL my Chemtrail Videos
Financial / Economic / Central Bank Videos
Please Visit my other Blog Sites - Answers to Mysterious and Chronic Health Conditions
Trump Administration wants to REVOKE Religious Exemptions for Vaccinations
Supreme Court of the United States No. 24-1015, John Doe, et al. v. Kathy Hochul, et al.. [1]
This is a brief, which is a legal document explaining that the Trump Administration wants to REVOKE Religious Exemptions for Vaccinations.
Instead of defending
New York City employees who were either suspended without pay or
terminated for being denied vaccine exemptions based on religious
grounds, the Trump administration is siding with the State of New
York who refused to accept religious exemptions.
It is a
legal filing with the Supreme Court, first and foremost wants to make
sure that when we have another "Plandemic" that ALL
healthcare employees MUST take the 'Countermeasures' (Vaccines) and
this is just the first step of making EVERY Corporation to go with
the vaccine agenda and Mandate Vaccines.
The brief was filed by the Solicitor General of the United States (DOJ) in response to a Supreme Court invitation (CVSG).
The Solicitor General is under the Attorney General. BOTH are appointed by the President and in this case, President Trump.
This filing to the Supreme Court -- “Supreme Court of the United States No. 24-1015, John Doe, et al. v. Kathy Hochul, et al..” is about the Petitioners from the state of NY, who argued that their rights were violated as the State of NY required them to be vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines or risk termination of employment. [2]
The NY Department of Health explicitly stated during an August 26, 2021 hearing that covered entities will NO LONGER be permitted to provide religious exemptions to personnel covered by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. [3]
They stated that Emergency Regulations Supersede the August 18, 2021 Order for Summary Action issued to hospitals and nursing homes that provided for religious exemptions.
There were “too many” people demanding Religious Exemptions.
A lower court ruled unfavorably for the them so they filed with the Supreme Court to hear the case.
The US Gov (DOJ), under the Trump Administration is asking the Supreme Court to DENY this writ of certiorari which is a legal order issued by a higher court directing a lower court to send up the record of a case for review.
In short, the Trump administration doesn’t want the Supreme Court to have anything to do with this.
It is clear and obvious now that Trump’s Department of Justice wants the States to decide on whether they will “accept” vaccine religious exemptions.
NY State denied many religious exemption requests for the COVID-19 vaccines, and the DOJ is completely fine with this.
In fact, so fine that they petition the Supreme Court not to review the lower courts ruling in favor of New York States decision to deny vaccine exemptions on religious merit.
They (Trump’s DOJ) are obviously in favor of denying religious exemptions for vaccines and MANDATING Experimental Vaccines. After all, this case is about the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that were made Mandatory by NY State Health Agencies.
It’s not hard, just connect the dots and you can easily see that there is a Vaccine Agenda and it is backed by the U.S. Government.
This all stems from “Vaccine Guidance” for New York City Employers from a document Titled: “New York City Commission on Human Rights. Guidance for Employers on Equitable Implementation of COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements.” [4]
“Employers do not have to grant any reasonable accommodation that would cause a direct threat to other employees or customers, or to the requester, or otherwise impose an undue hardship on the employer’s business.”
“Examples of accommodations that are likely to pose a direct threat include accommodations that would allow an unvaccinated employee to engage in a high-risk activity, such as yelling or exercising, while in close proximity to others, or to work in close proximity to high-risk individuals.”
“If there is no reasonable accommodation that would enable an unvaccinated employee to continue performing their job duties without posing a direct threat or an undue hardship, their employer can offer a leave of absence until the employee is able to provide proof of vaccination, or until it is otherwise safe for them to return to work.”
“Employers do not need to pay employees during a leave of absence unless the employer pays other workers who are unable to work for similar reasons.”
This was put forth by the New York City Commission on Human Rights and signed by Mayor Bill de Blasio on 12/15/2021.
Here is the main paragraph in my opinion: “Employees who are seeking reasonable accommodations because of their religious beliefs should not be required to submit supporting documentation unless their employer has an objective basis to question the sincerity of the religious basis for the employee’s inability to show proof of vaccination.”
*The Keyword being “UNLESS.” It says Unless the employer has an “Objective Basis” to Question the “Sincerity” of the Religious Basis.
If the person requesting the vaccine exemption based on Religious Beliefs state ANY “Non-Religious” Concerns, like “Medical Safety Concerns”, then the Employer has the right to question as Medical Safety Concerns that deal with Safety, Side Effects and Clinical Trials are considered framed Religious Beliefs. In other words, frivolous and exemption request can be denied by the Employer and the employer can mandate them to take vaccine, mandate Proof not only took the vaccine but meet the definitions of “Fully Vaccinated” meaning taking the “boosters” and if they don’t the employer can “offer” an UNPAID Leave of Absence.
This was the initial “nudge” that state employers needed to Mandate Vaccines, Deny Religious Exemptions based “Objective Basis”, offer Leave of Absences with NO Pay until the employees could provide PROOF that they were not only Vaccinated, but met the status of being “Fully Vaccinated.”
The US Gov is arguing that the Petitioners case, consisting of mostly State Employees, should be thrown out as they were already “protected by Federal Law,
Well, the Petitioners say that Federal Laws did NOT protect them.
If the Supreme Court sides with the US Government on this - throwing out the cases of those petitioning that it is unlawful to revoke religious exemptions, it gets the ball rolling for any state to believe the they have the discretion to deny religious exemptions for employment mandated vaccines.
The interpretation may even be that the Supreme Court has their backs when they deny vaccine exemptions from state mandatory vaccine policies during “health emergencies.”
You don’t think that the Federation of State Medical Boards who just LOVE Vaccines aren’t watching this closely?
The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) is basically a conglomerate Medical Board consisting of members from each state and they have HEAVY influence on ALL States. They are as Pro-Vax as can be.
The FSMB played a VERY important role in hushing up the doctors who were questioning the safety and efficacy of the experimental COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. If doctors did not follow the “science” that was given to them, and began talking about what they were actually seeing with their own eyes in their own practices, and if that didn’t match the narrative science – then the FSMB censored them and even revoked their license if they were too far from the vaccine narrative that claimed the mRNA’s were safe and effective.
The FSMB revoked Medical Licenses from doctors who were just warning that these are ‘experimental.’ [5]
This spreading of ‘misinformation’ could “erode public trust in the Medical Profession.” [2]
God forbid the Public begins critically thinking for themselves.
The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) are fully prepared to impose their direct influence to guide, and encourage the "Models" they create on mandating vaccines to the legislatures and writers of Public Policies in each state.
Although this in NY, if the Supreme Court agrees with the DOJ and denies the petition for a writ of certiorari, the implications can quickly be nationalized.
These employees should have been protected under Federal Laws, which were based off of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was formed from the U.S. Constitution, First Amendment which Protects Religious Belief. This is why Vaccine Mandates are Unconstitutional. Plus, under EUA they violate the Nuremberg Code as they are classified as "Experimental Medicines" and Informed Consent is "mandatory" from each and ever individual before they are administered.
The State of NY is using this for reasoning under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: [6]
“The term "religion" includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee's or prospective employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business.”
They argue that these COVID-19 mRNA vaccines prevented a “HARDSHIP” by preventing disease in the workplace.
The State of New York says that Vaccine Mandates ARE Constitutional and Legal: [7]
“Federal and State courts have already decided and determined that vaccine mandates, including this one in particular, are constitutional and legal. See We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. Hochul, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33691, 2d Cir., Nov. 12, 2021, injunction denied by 142 S. Ct. 552 (Supreme Court of the United States, December 13, 2021, upholding the constitutionality of this regulation).”
The COVID-19
Vaccines were Emergency Use Authorized, which means they did not go
through proper Safety and Efficacy testing. The term "properly"
is interpreted differently during a declared public health
emergency.
People need to know this.
The Covid
Vaccines were NOT tested for Safety as they should have been, period,
100% and the next ones EUA’d won't be either.
They did not go
through regular safety and efficacy testing.
Remember this
and start doing your own research on this stuff.
This
ruling by the Supreme Court could lead to the states following New
York’s lead and revoke religious exemptions, and place employees on
leave of absence until they comply with proof of being ‘fully
vaccinated’ during another upcoming declared public health
emergency.
This petition by
Trump’s DOJ could provide the “Framework” to “legally”
removing religious exemptions for mandatory vaccines.
We
shouldn't even have to have a so called "Religious Exemption"
we should be be able to choose AFTER we have been "INFORMED"
and that is by doing our OWN research along with so called "medical
advice."
Vaccinations should
be a PERSONAL decision, not the governments decision.
Once
we are Informed it should be a SIMPLE - YES or NO.
BUT
they are stepping up their game to even have Religious Exemptions
removed.
This briefing is referring to a New York Public
Health Regulation - Section 2.61,
(10 NYCRR § 2.61)
which REQUIRED that ALL Healthcare Employees. [8]
This 2.61 Regulation was titled "Prevention of COVID-19 Transmission by Covered Entities."
The "Entities" were ALL facilities regulated by the New York State Department of Health.
Including: employees in Nursing Homes, those in Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, Home Health Agencies, Hospices and Adult Care Facilities must be Fully Vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of employment or service.
Then you remember
that they kept changing the definition of "Fully Vaccinated"
to include one "Booster" after another.
So how
did that Covid Mandated Vaccination work out?
Did it
prevent transmission?
You would think that
the entire world should have learned that mandating COVID Vaccines
was a monumental mistake. It just gets clearer as time passes by and
now the DOJ wants to the Supreme Court to concur with a lower court
that ruled in favor of New York State’s Vaccine Policies which were
that employees were mandated to take the Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines and
Religious Exemptions were denied.
Are you seeing the
Tyranny here?
Are you seeing an Agenda here?
Are you seeing a merging of Corporate and State Interests?
When the corporate and the state merges their interests into one, the people will never have a chance.
Why?
Because of “Regulatory Capture.” [9, 10 & 11]
“Regulatory Capture.” It’s where those who supposed to be regulating industry become the very ones being ‘influenced’ by the corporations.
The regulators become part of corporations and the corporations become part of the regulators and they serve as one representing themselves and the people become victims of oppression.
When Regulatory Systems become CAPTURED, we are finished.
Take a look at the ingredients in our Food and ask yourself if the FDA is not captured.
Take a look at the side effects for almost every drug and ask yourself if the FDA is not captured.
Take a look at the Financial System and ask yourself if it is not Captured – this one was captured in 1913.
Take a look at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has not this one been captured also?
What about Workplace and Labor?
What about Transportation – the FAA (think 9/11).
AND what about Communications & Technology? What is going up everywhere in ALL states right now? Data Centers. What do you think they are really for?
All of this leads to ABUSES of POWERS and REGULATORY FAILURES in all of these regulated systems.
The real questions we need to be asking is about the DOJ, the state Supreme Courts (Appeals Courts) and the National Supreme Court. If these are captured to, do we really have ANY freedom or are we living in an Illusion?
If these are captured, how does this benefit the people? Who are the real beneficiaries?
AND that’s just what is happening here.
Aaron Siri – “Mandates are the Tool of Bullies, Criminals and Dictators” [12]
“Mandates are the tool of bullies, criminals and dictators.”
“If a patient refuses a medical product after being conveyed its benefits and risks, then that is called informed consent. They were informed and did not consent.”
“Mandating over this objection is immoral and illiberal.”
It seems like there are NO Limits on Government and Corporate Power, but the true limits have been transferred and placed upon the people questioning the various Regulatory Overreaches.
Does the Constitution really have any Jurisdiction today? [13]
Article VI, “The Supremacy Clause” of the Constitution written in 1787 and ratified in 1788 states the Constitution shall be the “Supreme Law of the Land.”
It also states that the "Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution."
If all these government officials, senators and representatives take an oath to derive authority from the Constitution, why don’t they ever mention the constitution?
How often is the constitution mentioned these days?
Does it seem like the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land?
Is America truly being Made Great Again?
If so, for who?
Sources:
1-2. Supreme Court of the United States. Does CVSG, No. 24-1015. 18 May 2026, https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1015/409182/20260518162120878_Does%20CVSG_final.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2026.
3. Spina, Kelly C., et al. “New York Expands Vaccination Mandate for Health Care Workers.” Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), 3 Sept. 2021, https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/employment-law-compliance/new-york-expands-vaccination-mandate-health-care-workers. Accessed 27 May 2026.
4. New York City Commission on Human Rights. Guidance for Employers on Equitable Implementation of COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements. City of New York, Dec. 2021, https://www.nyc.gov/assets/cchr/downloads/pdf/publications/Vax-Employment-Guidance.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2026.
5. Federation of State Medical Boards. “FSMB: Spreading COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation May Put Medical License at Risk.” Newswise, 29 July 2021, Newswise. Accessed 27 May 2026.
6. “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964. Accessed 27 May 2026.
7-8. “Prevention of COVID-19 Transmission by Covered Entities.” New York State Department of Health, New York State Register (Recently Adopted Regulations), https://regs.health.ny.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/recently_adopted_regulations/Prevention%20of%20COVID-19%20Transmission%20by%20Covered%20Entities_1.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2026.
9. Stigler, George J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, no. 1, 1971, pp. 3–21.
10. Dalal, Sucheta, and Debashis Basu. Absolute Power: Inside Story of the National Stock Exchange’s Amazing Success, Leading to Hubris, Regulatory Capture and Algo Scam. Penguin Random House India, 2021.
11. Lindsey, Brink, and Steven M. Teles. The Captured Economy: How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequality. Oxford University Press, 2017.
12. Siri, Aaron. "Pinned Post: Mandates are the tool of bullies, criminals and dictators." Facebook, 25 July 2024, https://www.facebook.com/aaron.siri.3. Accessed on May 27, 2026.
13. “Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause).” Constitution Annotated, U.S. Congress, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-6/. Accessed 27 May 2026.
END. 5/27/2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Post a Comment